On Friday night, Google’s head of search spam, Matt Cutts tweeted a link to a Gawker story named Shady promoting companies area unit Still Quietly Bribing Bloggers. Matt said, “we’re taking action on many patrons, dozens of web sites, & dozens of spammy writers,” in relation to that story.
It is arduous to mention if Google has taken action or is wanting to require action within the close to future against sites victimisation this method however it's clear, Google is aware of concerning it.
The technique isn't regarding attending to the location owner and commercialism links through the owner of the site. Instead, it's going on to the communicator or blogger and obtaining them to “editorially” add links to sites while not Website owner’s information. it'd be like one among you guys paying Pine Tree State to link to your web site} while not the owner of this site knowing that payment. you'll browse the dialog between the SEO UN agency was doing the bribing and therefore the blogger who outed them at Gawker.
Google’s Matt Cutts wrote they're “taking action on many patrons, dozens of web sites, & dozens of spammy writers.” Now, this could be his method of frustrating spammers to interrupt their spirits. Or it should be Google’s frequent manual actions on link sellers, buyers, networks and brokers.
Either way, once it involves denying rule updates, Matt responded once more oral communication “we attempt to avoid major rule updates close to the vacations. however spamfighting forever continues.”
This may imply that what webmasters saw on the seventeenth and nineteenth may well be associated with spamfighting efforts of Google?
Copy From : http://goo.gl/jvYk0f
It is arduous to mention if Google has taken action or is wanting to require action within the close to future against sites victimisation this method however it's clear, Google is aware of concerning it.
The technique isn't regarding attending to the location owner and commercialism links through the owner of the site. Instead, it's going on to the communicator or blogger and obtaining them to “editorially” add links to sites while not Website owner’s information. it'd be like one among you guys paying Pine Tree State to link to your web site} while not the owner of this site knowing that payment. you'll browse the dialog between the SEO UN agency was doing the bribing and therefore the blogger who outed them at Gawker.
Google’s Matt Cutts wrote they're “taking action on many patrons, dozens of web sites, & dozens of spammy writers.” Now, this could be his method of frustrating spammers to interrupt their spirits. Or it should be Google’s frequent manual actions on link sellers, buyers, networks and brokers.
Either way, once it involves denying rule updates, Matt responded once more oral communication “we attempt to avoid major rule updates close to the vacations. however spamfighting forever continues.”
This may imply that what webmasters saw on the seventeenth and nineteenth may well be associated with spamfighting efforts of Google?
Copy From : http://goo.gl/jvYk0f